Thomas Sowell

Capital Gains Taxes

By Thomas Sowell - Tuesday, October 2, 2012

One of the many false talking points of the Obama administration is that a rich man like Warren Buffett should not be paying a lower tax rate than his secretary. But anyone whose earnings come from capital gains usually pays a lower tax rate.

How are capital gains different from ordinary income?

Ordinary income is usually guaranteed. If you work a certain amount of time, you are legally entitled to the pay that you were offered when you took the job. Capital gains involve risk. They are not guaranteed. You can invest your money and lose it all. Moreover, the year when you receive capital gains may not be the same as the years when they were earned.

Suppose I spend ten years writing a book, making not one cent from it in all that time. Then, in the tenth year, when the book is finished, I may sell it to a publisher who pays me $100,000 in advance royalties.

Am I the same as someone who has a salary of $100,000 that year? Or am I earning $10,000 a year for ten years’ work?

It so happens that the government will tax me the same as someone who earns $100,000 that year, because my decade of work on the book cannot be documented. But the point here is that it is really a capital gain, and it illustrates the difference between a capital gain and ordinary income.

Then there is the risk factor. There is no guarantee to me that a publisher will actually accept the book that I have worked on for ten years — and there is no guarantee to the publisher that the public will buy enough copies of the book to repay whatever I might be paid when the contract is signed.

Even the $10,000 a year — which is less than anyone can earn on an entry level job — is not guaranteed. If my years of work produced an unpublished manuscript, I would not even have been among the first thousand writers who met this fate.

Very similar principles apply to businesses. We pay attention to businesses after they have succeeded. But most new businesses do not succeed. Even those businesses that eventually turn out to be enormously successful may go through years of losing money before they have their first year of earning a profit.

Amazon.com spent years losing money before turning a profit for the first time in 2001. McDonald’s teetered on the edge of bankruptcy more than once in its early years. Desperate expedients were resorted to by the people who ran McDonald’s, in order to just keep their noses above the water, while hoping for better days.

At one time, you could have bought half interest in McDonald’s for $25,000 — and there were no takers. Anyone who would have risked $25,000 at that time would be a billionaire today. But there was no guarantee at the time that they wouldn’t be just throwing 25 grand down a rat hole.

Where a capital gain can be documented — when a builder spends ten years creating a housing development, for example — then whatever that builder earns in the tenth year is a capital gain, not ordinary income. There is no guarantee in advance that the builder will ever recover his expenses, much less make a profit.

There are whole industries where no one can expect to make a profit the first year — publishing a newspaper for example. Virtually every major American airline has lost money in some years, and some of the biggest and most famous airlines have ended up going bankrupt.

If a country wants investors to invest, it cannot tax their resulting capital gains the same as the incomes of people whose incomes were guaranteed in advance when they took the job.

It is not just a question of “fairness” to investors. Ultimately, it is investors who guarantee other people’s incomes in a market economy, even though the investors’ own incomes are by no means guaranteed. Reducing investors’ incentives to take risks is reducing the jobs their investments are likely to create.

Business income is different from employees’ income in another way. The profit that a business makes is first taxed as profit and the remainder is then taxed again as the incomes of people who receive dividends.

The biggest losers from politicians who jack up tax rates are likely to be people who are looking for jobs that will not be there, because investments will not be there to create the jobs.

COPYRIGHT 2013 THOMAS SOWELL/CREATORS.COM


Be the first to read Thomas Sowell's columns and other Voice of Sanity articles by signing up today and having them delivered directly into your inbox each morning.

Additional articles by Thomas Sowell

Respond to Writer

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints. Make your case passionately, but please keep your comments civil and to the point (maximum of 1500 characters). Obscene, profane, abusive, or off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion. Thanks for your participation.

16 Responses to “Capital Gains Taxes”

  1. Mark says:

    Nice to read something sane for a change.

  2. Richard says:

    Thanks for clarifying these issues in one article. Most of America is simply clueless about capital gain taxation versus the taxes paid on ordinary income.

    • Stinger51 says:

      This is probably due to the fact that 47% of Americans pay no federal income tax. So, they certainly would not have any investments to pay capital gains on.

      But we can see the economic morons in the Press love to obfuscate this issue. They couldn't even bring themselves (in most cases) to explain the difference between Warren Buffet's income and that of his secretary. Nor did it suit their class warfare purposes to do so. Hence, the ignorance continues.

      Romney is exactly right about this 47%. Those on welfare, food stamps, section 8 housing, etc. could care less about this issue. So, I wouldn't touch it during the campaign. He would just put these dummies to sleep. Then again, most of them are already asleep. They are more worried about which NFL team is going to win than the future of their grandchildren. And, if justice be served, they deserve neither their Sunday ticket nor grandchildren.

  3. Ken Okko says:

    Another GREAT post from Dr. Sowell – little wonder that he is on the Ron Paul Team. One day, in the not too distant future, Americans will come to realize that the Keynesian Establishment combined DeeemonCrap-Repugnant welfare-WARfare Bg Govt Party [combined] is the problem. And, only, the Austrian-school Libertarian-themed Small Govt promoting thiking and doing statesmen and women will save us. IMO U No Who

  4. PitBull says:

    Thank you, Dr. Sowell. It all makes sense to me….and to many,many others who are chided for being 'in the tank' for capitalism.

    And there's the rub! Dr. Sowell makes sense. And most dumbed-down-americans — as well as millions of elite, administrative dumbed-down-socialists/liberals/progressives throughout the world — don't like the 'smell of sense.' Our flamboyant, rotting celebrity culture – the modern-day bread-and-circus guys and gals – prefer hype, OWS, entitlements, victimhood, banter ala 'The View', entertainment ala 'American Idol', gimme my daily dose of weed, football season drama, a divisive 'spread the wealth' POTUS. You do get the picture, don't you????

  5. Gary says:

    Off subject but possible germaine. Probably the best reason to listen to Rush Limbaugh is that he does go on holiday and Walter Williams is often invited to guest host. Conversations between Williams and his friend Sowell can be rated as Talk Radio being as good as it can get.

  6. J. Paul Basinger says:

    If only the GOP and Mitt could find a way to tell this in a convincing way to the blinded public in a 30 sec campaign commercial!

  7. John says:

    I had an opportunity this past weekend to speak with a Romney campaign representative at an event in Chantilly, VA. I expressed my concern that Romney wasn't putting out a strong forceful message, spelling out his plans to reverse our economic problems, etc. The rep explained to me that Romney and Ryan were putting out EXACTLY that message every day, but it wasn't "getting through the media filters." At the time I thought the guy was just trying to placate me because even FOX is showing essentially the same footage and reports as ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC. Today I watched the video enclosed below and I'll be damned if the media isn't airing an altered video that makes Romney look like a complete idiot! The video has been doctored with the subtitle "Ryan, Ryan, Ryan" that completely changes the message – watch the short video and compare the same footage with the unedited C-SPAN video. This is an absolute fraud that the media is perpetrating on the American public, they are complicit in not only "selective" reporting that favors Obama but outright distortions and lies. Romney/Ryan can't win against a stacked deck – every American needs to see this video and expose these corrupt bastards!

    http://resistance.ning.com/forum/topic/show?id=26…

  8. paul whitfield says:

    the people who need to read this cant read or understand it, and most dont want to read or understand it. what can be done with this class of folks? most every political body in the land has been dealing with these issues for 150 years. why are the answers so difficult? or why will someonew not state the answers other than you and perhaps Bill Cosby (and a couple others)

    • John says:

      paul, I think you've hit the nail on the head – they don't know, and don't care. Until they start loosing their "free stuff" they will remain reliable Democrat voters. Ignorance and apathy are our greatest enemies. To quote the writer H.L. Mencken: "No one ever went broke underestimating the gullibility of the American public."

  9. Dick Kukowski says:

    A concise and to the point explanation of the difference between ordinary income and
    capital gains. Had never given this distinction much thought but this tutorial is a
    valuable lesson in economic equity. I'm greatly enlightened.

  10. Common Sense says:

    I usually find Thomas Sowell's columns excellent reading, but I disagree with a few points in this one. Writing a book over a ten year period and getting an advance isn't a capital gain, neither is a developer who builds a subdivision for example. They are both analogous to McDonald's investing in buns and burgers to sell in their shops. The book is a product put out on the market, as is the real property by the developer.

    • He didn't say it was a capital gain. In fact he says in the very next sentence that he will be taxed on the full amount as income. His argument is that the IRS won't allow it as a capital gain. If that builder sells the property in the tenth year it certainly would be a capital gain. Well whatever the current scheme the best arrangement would be no taxes on investment or income just tax consumption. ie Fair Tax.. It's much more stable and much less ripe for fraud. Instead of every worker being taxed you only tax point of sale transactions. Everyone pays something you get a prebate for normal household expenses ie clothes food etc… Criminals now have to pay as well as rich, poor, middle classes, But your paycheck goes up because you pay no Federal Tax on the income. No more loopholes no more power plays by politicians.

  11. Chris McMorrow says:

    Dr. Sowell, you state that “The biggest losers from politicians who jack up tax rates are likely to be people who are looking for jobs that will not be there, because investments will not be there to create the jobs.”

    True, Dr., but don’t you realize that the all-consuming, ever-destructive cash-starved Federal Black Hole must continuously be fed?

    The fact is, politicians who hate freedom, limited government and private property rights don’t give a damn about anybody but themselves. The vast majority of politicians (and ALL Democrats) are only interested in feathering their own nests. This principle is made clear in Davy Crockett’s book excerpt, “Not Yours to Give.”

  12. Nightrider says:

    Dr Sowell's piece of information here is something liberals and the entitlements crowd either don't know or don't want to know and acknowledge as making a lot of sense. They'd rather go
    with the slogan ' tax the rich, tax those with capital gains who expended no time or labor to achieve them." They don't want to hear about working and saving, investing, risk-taking, and incentives.

  13. dddigger8 says:

    What Dr. Sowell pointed out in this article is nothing more than TAX LAW. When the politiciansd complain about the rich not paying enough taxes, they are either stupid or pretending to be stupid to divide the country against each other. The rich pay their taxes according to the TAX LAW.

Leave a Reply

To Receive Free Daily
Articles Via E-mail
Click Here

Featured Columnists

The Problem:
A Government-Created Depression
The Solution: Set the Entrepreneur Free to Create Wealth!

Click here to learn about Robert Ringer's landmark new book, The Entrepreneur:
The Way Back for the U.S. Economy
, that is shocking the establishment.

Liberty Education
Interview Series

Robert Ringer interviews top political, economic, and social leaders on today's most vital and controversial issues.

Wayne Allyn Root Interview

Featured Interview:
Wayne Allyn Root

Audio file loading...

More Interviews