COUP DE (FOIE) GRAS

By Peter Bernard - Tuesday, July 24, 2012

The joy of tucking into a perfectly prepared prime rib of beef at a fine restaurant.  The lingering memories of a joyous Thanksgiving with family and friends, highlighted by a succulent turkey dinner.  The hot dog “with everything” wolfed down by a happy kid at his first ballgame.

Food is surely one of our favorite things.  So it’s hard to believe that there are people out there who would want to take any of our gustatory pleasures away from us.

Well, believe it.  And they want to do it with government sanction.

California has joined several countries around the world in banning the production of foie gras.  Foie gras is the liver of a duck or goose that has been fattened up by a process known as “gavage,” where a feeding tube is placed in the throat of Donald Duck or Mother Goose.

The methodology was developed by the ancient Egyptians and Romans long before the sophisticated French made it into a culinary art form. But now opponents of this delicacy managed to get SB1520, which prohibits the force feeding of any bird, signed into law in September 2004 (though implementation was delayed until July 2012).

What these folks object to is the so-called cruelty to the bird.  A feeding tube?  Quelle horreur!  How evil!  How barbaric!  Or, maybe not.

Famed French chef Jacques Pepin recently stated in an interview on KQED’s Bay Area Bites that gavage is really a “natural process.”  In fact, he noted, these birds gorge themselves in the wild in preparation for migration.

Dr. Temple Grandin, a renowned animal husbandry expert, explained in an interview in The Village Voice that the birds do not even have a gag reflex.  And veterinarian Jeanne Smith testified to the California Legislature that gavage is the preferred way to treat sick or injured birds.  Others have commented on the clean facilities and well-cared-for poultry sighted at such farms as the one operated by Hudson Valley Foie Gras in New York.

So what motivates the animal rights whackos?

The online logo for Animal Rights and Anti-Oppression tells us, soothingly, that the group is about challenging “oppression and injustice against nonhuman animals, humans, and earth – one vegan, environmentalist, feminist, social-justice-loving progressive post at a time.”

On a site called Viva!, Justin Kerswell (the site’s “Campaigns Manager”) averred, “There is no such thing as humane meat.  The best way to end the suffering of animals is not to eat them.  It is as simple as that.”

How about PETA?  They state their goal as “ending fur and leather use … meat and dairy consumption … fishing … hunting … trapping … factory farming … circuses … bull fighting … ” Hmmm.  Interesting that PETA’s founder, Ingrid Newkirk, has compared the poultry industry to the Holocaust!

A big issue for all these activists is the abuse of animals that are being raised as sources of food.  And their solution is for everyone to stop eating meat … on moral and ethical grounds.

So why has foie gras been singled out for legislation?

Chef Josiah Citrin of the gourmet French restaurant Melisse in Santa Monica, California, called foie gras “low hanging fruit.”  He told a reporter that, unlike the beef industry, the foie gras producers don’t have the resources to fight back.  And because there’s a very limited market for the stuff, banning it isn’t going to get many consumers riled up.

But don’t expect the animal rights people to stop by shaming us into becoming vegetarians.  They won’t be satisfied until eating meat – all meat – is actually illegal.  How are they going to make that happen?

Consider this …

In February of this year, Dr. Lori Marino of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, offered “a declaration of the rights of cetaceans” at the annual meeting of the AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science).  She claimed that due to their intelligence and self-awareness, whales and dolphins count as non-human persons and therefore have “moral rights.”  Philosopher Peter Singer has long advocated similar rights for the Great Apes – gorillas, bonobos, orangutans, and the like.

In the words of Dr. Marino, “ … this is not about harvesting resources, this is about murder.”

Bon appétit.

 

 

COPYRIGHT 2013 PETER BERNARD/CREATORS.COM


Be the first to read Peter Bernard's columns and other Voice of Sanity articles by signing up today and having them delivered directly into your inbox each morning.

Additional articles by Peter Bernard

Respond to Writer

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints. Make your case passionately, but please keep your comments civil and to the point (maximum of 1500 characters). Obscene, profane, abusive, or off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion. Thanks for your participation.

10 Responses to “COUP DE (FOIE) GRAS”

  1. Pete DiOrio says:

    "…the group is about challenging “oppression and injustice against nonhuman animals, humans, and earth – one vegan, environmentalist, feminist, social-justice-loving progressive post at a time.”

    I find it ironic, if not amusing, that I consider the people running around claiming to have the biggest hearts turn out to be my biggest enemies.

  2. The Resolute Voice says:

    Why do animal rights groups never worry about human rights and human abuse? They look the other way all the time when people are murdered or abused or lose their rights… but animals… well, that's their obsession.

    • BLH557 says:

      Ingrid Newkirk's battle cry sums it up; "A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy." Notice "boy" comes last.

      Just wait; saving the mosquito is next.

  3. Gill O’Teen says:

    I'll believe these dolts are concerned with animal/human rights when they come out against abortion.

    I'm still coming to grips with the simple truth that if these tyrants were allowed to pursue their agenda to its logical extreme, orca, sharks, pirana, lions, tigers, bears, wolves, house cats and dogs would be criminals since all enjoy the taste of meat and have been known to hunt and kill their food. This would lead to a conundrum. If predatory animals are felonious criminals should they be allowed to vote as would be their human right? If herbivorous critters are allowed to vote, but not carnivores based on a natural trait, isn't that racial discrimination?

    In the interest of full disclosure, I did pick up a PETA bumper sticker at a jerky shop in the Dallas area: People for Eating Tasty Animals.

  4. texas wolfie says:

    "Thinking themselves wise, they became as fools"

  5. Although we have eliminated many of the worst forms of animal abuse, there are still some that need attention, particularly in the developing world (too dangerous, uncomfortable and far from the media for many of the do-gooders)

    What these organisations along with their counterparts trying to ban the use of animals in sport (Rodeo, chuck wagon racing, and other equine events) fail to realise is that should they ever be successful, they would be guaranteeing a huge reduction in the gene pool of many breeds leading to the extinction of those breeds and even species.

    As much as we might love animals, how many of us could afford to keep breeding herds of horses or cattle if they had no commercial value either for enjoyment or as food?

  6. Kim says:

    Maybe we could get PETA and the Australian greens party all together on an island somewhere devoid of anything but plant life,I'm thinking 'Lord Of The Flies" scenario here folks and see what eventuates.

    Mmmmm pork BBQ anyone?

  7. 42sundown says:

    Benefit of being old: Having seen nearly all of it, done much of it, and remember most of it.

    It's all about incrementalism folks. When the Soviets fell apart and quit sending the checks to the "comrades," these talented activists went to the Greens, animal rights, PETA, fake humane and conservation groups. This allows them to make a living in their chosen field of interferring and causing problems and chaos for the US. These jobs allow them to also freelance at times for the unions, such as with the Wisconsin Recall. the World Trade Center, and the NATO demonstrations. They have lately had a lot of business doing Occupy Wall Street gigs. Some of them are true believers, some just stupid, and some just mercenary. They still dabble in the "Peace" movements, but without Soviet leadership and money, they are pretty quiet. With one of theirs in the White House they have no incentive. Don't let these chicken$hits have any donations so they will have to prey on little old ladies who are poor. We'll never be able to prevent that…………Semper Fi

  8. Jack Settles says:

    Well, Well, Well, Lions, Tigers and Bears, O My! This sort of thing has been going on for time immemoriam…(sp). I doubt it will lesson any time soon. If necessary and if it gets to the floor of our esteemed Gov., Let your congress. people know how you feel. They will.

  9. Clarence F Morrison says:

    I am also particular with the meat or chicken I eat. I love it and never see myself being a vegetarian. I bought egg incubators for sale to raise my own, as we also have a farm in the province. We eat what we take care of.

Leave a Reply

To Receive Free Daily
Articles Via E-mail
Click Here

Featured Columnists

The Problem:
A Government-Created Depression
The Solution: Set the Entrepreneur Free to Create Wealth!

Click here to learn about Robert Ringer's landmark new book, The Entrepreneur:
The Way Back for the U.S. Economy
, that is shocking the establishment.

Liberty Education
Interview Series

Robert Ringer interviews top political, economic, and social leaders on today's most vital and controversial issues.

Wayne Allyn Root Interview

Featured Interview:
Wayne Allyn Root

Audio file loading...

More Interviews