Thomas Sowell

Obama’s Rhetoric

By Thomas Sowell - Thursday, July 19, 2012

Barack Obama’s great rhetorical gifts include the ability to make the absurd sound not only plausible, but inspiring and profound.

His latest verbal triumph was to say on July 13th, “if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own.” As an example, “Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen.”

Let’s stop and think, even though the whole purpose of much political rhetoric is to keep us from thinking, and stir our emotions instead.

Even if we were to assume, just for the sake of argument, that 90 percent of what a successful person has achieved was due to the government, what follows from that? That politicians will make better decisions than individual citizens, that politicians will spend the wealth of the country better than those who created it? That doesn’t follow logically — and certainly not empirically.

Does anyone doubt that most people owe a lot to the parents who raised them? But what follows from that? That they should never become adults who make their own decisions?

The whole point of the collectivist mindset is to concentrate power in the hands of the collectivists — which is to say, to take away our freedom. They do this in stages, starting with some group that others envy or resent — Jews in Nazi Germany, capitalists in the Soviet Union, foreign investors in Third World countries that confiscate their investments and call this theft “nationalization.”

Freedom is seldom destroyed all at once. More often it is eroded, bit by bit, until it is gone. This can happen so gradually that there is no sudden change that would alert people to the danger. By the time everybody realizes what has happened, it can be too late, because their freedom is gone.

All the high-flown talk about how people who are successful in business should “give back” to the community that created the things that facilitated their success is, again, something that sounds plausible to people who do not stop and think through what is being said. After years of dumbed-down education, that apparently includes a lot of people.

Take Obama’s example of the business that benefits from being able to ship their products on roads that the government built. How does that create a need to “give back”?

Did the taxpayers, including business taxpayers, not pay for that road when it was built? Why should they have to pay for it twice?

What about the workers that businesses hire, whose education is usually created in government-financed schools? The government doesn’t have any wealth of its own, except what it takes from taxpayers, whether individuals or businesses. They have already paid for that education. It is not a gift that they have to “give back” by letting politicians take more of their money and freedom.

When businesses hire highly educated people, such as chemists or engineers, competition in the labor market forces them to pay higher salaries for people with longer years of valuable education. That education is not a government gift to the employers. It is paid for while it is being created in schools and universities, and it is paid for in higher salaries when highly educated people are hired.

One of the tricks of professional magicians is to distract the audience’s attention from what they are doing while they are creating an illusion of magic. Pious talk about “giving back” distracts our attention from the cold fact that politicians are taking away more and more of our money and our freedom.

Even the envy that politicians stir up against “the rich” is highly focussed on those particular high income-earners whose decisions the politicians want to take over. Others in sports or entertainment can make far more money than the highest paid corporate executive, but there is no way that politicians can take over the roles of Roger Federer or Oprah Winfrey, so highly paid sports stars or entertainers are never accused of “greed.”

If we are so easily distracted by self-serving political rhetoric, we are not only going to see our money, but our freedom, increasingly taken away from us by slick-talking politicians, including our current slick-talker-in-chief in the White House.

COPYRIGHT 2013 THOMAS SOWELL/CREATORS.COM


Be the first to read Thomas Sowell's columns and other Voice of Sanity articles by signing up today and having them delivered directly into your inbox each morning.

Additional articles by Thomas Sowell

Respond to Writer

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints. Make your case passionately, but please keep your comments civil and to the point (maximum of 1500 characters). Obscene, profane, abusive, or off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion. Thanks for your participation.

7 Responses to “Obama’s Rhetoric”

  1. Rob says:

    The more Obama speaks without a teleprompter the more we learn what he really thinks. I do not think "no one successful on their own" will become part of his stump speech.

    Obama is a pure Socialist who believes govt will do better than any individual or business.

    I hope Obama keeps giving speeches without his trusty teleprompter so more Americans can hear the "real" Obama, not the crafted orator he is positioned as.

  2. Naura Hayden says:

    Your ability to see through "self-serving political rhetoric" makes me so happy that you were born. Although there are far too few people like you in the press today, the fact that you are there gives me hope for the future of our beloved country. Please recognize that the few brilliant people in the U.S. right now who are capable of seeing and spreading the truth must make sure that your brilliance is heard by as many people as possible. All of you are our only hope to survive the current disaster. Bless you!

  3. Ken Okko says:

    I am certain that both Judge Napolitan and this fellow, Thomas Sowell, would be invited to be in President Ron Paul's cabinet. They are all friends and like-minded Libertarians – just what we need. IMO U No Who

  4. Bpth of these eloqent spokesmen are of the cadre of statesmen of which our founders prayed would ever be amongst us as guides, and issuers of caveats. Sowell for se.c of interiror..Napolitano for Atty Gen! & Walt Williams? Treasury, of course! Blessings, MLM

  5. Gill O’Teen says:

    Y'no, Ken. you need to wake up and avoid the roadkill. Your bedroom wall poster boy lost. It's time for you to get a handle on that reality and do all you can to deny another term to the reader-in-chief. As things stand today the only chance is the RINO from MA, sad but true. Dr. Ron competed for the RINO nomination, but failed to garner enough delegates to wear that banner. While he was fighting that fight, he conceded the Libertarian nomination to Gary Johnson who fared even more poorly in the RINO contest than Paul. Highly unlikely the Libertarian ticket has any chance of winning in November. Secretariat (1970-1989) has a better chance of winning this fall's Breeders' Cup Classic. The best it can hope do is pull enough votes away from the RINO to hand the election to the kenyan kommie which will end all chance of Dr. Paul ever fighting another day. None of us will be fighting another day. We will be encircled by an iron curtain through which not even light can pass. So if you want this to happen because only then will Americans see as clearly as you, you got another think coming. There will be no second chance. It's now or never – all or nothing. If you are not part of the solution, you are the problem.

  6. TANSTAAFL.ca says:

    Love the magician analogy. Well, partly 'cause I have been using that one for years myself.

    Note: changed to TANSTAAFL.ca since I note someone else is using TANSTAAFL.

  7. Common Sense says:

    I've read in my local paper quotes from successful business people who want to give back to the community. I've always thought that people buy a product or service for their own sake, not the sake of the business owner. Even friends and family buy for their own sake, by the way, we are ALL self-serving. Other people are only incidental beneficaries (or victims) of our self-serving actions.

Leave a Reply

To Receive Free Daily
Articles Via E-mail
Click Here

Featured Columnists

The Problem:
A Government-Created Depression
The Solution: Set the Entrepreneur Free to Create Wealth!

Click here to learn about Robert Ringer's landmark new book, The Entrepreneur:
The Way Back for the U.S. Economy
, that is shocking the establishment.

Liberty Education
Interview Series

Robert Ringer interviews top political, economic, and social leaders on today's most vital and controversial issues.

Wayne Allyn Root Interview

Featured Interview:
Wayne Allyn Root

Audio file loading...

More Interviews