While all eyes were on the Republican National Convention in Tampa and Hurricane Isaac on the Gulf Coast, the White House was quietly jacking up the price of automobiles and putting future drivers at risk.
Yes, the same cast of fable-tellers who falsely accused GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney of murdering a steelworker’s cancer-stricken wife is now directly imposing a draconian environmental regulation that will cost untold American lives.
On Tuesday, the administration announced that it had finalized “historic” new fuel efficiency standards. (Everything’s “historic” with these narcissists, isn’t it?) President Obama took a break from his historic fundraising drives to proclaim that “(by) the middle of the next decade, our cars will get nearly 55 miles per gallon, almost double what they get today. It’ll strengthen our nation’s energy security, it’s good for middle-class families, and it will help create an economy built to last.”
Jon Carson, director of Obama’s Office of Public Engagement, took to Twitter to hype how “auto companies support the higher fuel-efficiency standards” and how the rules crafted behind closed doors will “save consumers $8,000″ per vehicle. His source for these claims? The New York Times, America’s Fishwrap of Record, which has acknowledged it allows the Obama campaign to have “veto power” over reporters’ quotes from campaign officials.
And whom did the Times cite for the claim that the rules will “save consumers $8,000″? Why, the administration, of course! “The administration estimated that the new standards would save Americans $1.7 trillion in fuel costs,” the Times dutifully regurgitated, “resulting in an average savings of more than $8,000 a vehicle by 2025.”
The Obama administration touts the support of the government-bailed-out auto industry for these reckless, expensive regs. What they want you to forget is that the “negotiations” (read: bullying) with White House environmental radicals date back to former Obama green czar Carol Browner’s tenure — when she infamously told auto industry execs “to put nothing in writing, ever” regarding their secret CAFE talks.
Obama’s number-massagers cite phony-baloney cost savings that rely on developing future fuel-saving technology. Given this crony government’s abysmal track record in “investing” in new technologies (cough — Solyndra — cough), we can safely dismiss that fantasy math. What is real for consumers is the $2,000 per vehicle added cost that the new fuel standards will impose now. That figure comes from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
War on Middle-Class Consumers, anyone?
Beyond the White House-media lapdog echo chamber, the economic and public safety objections to these sweeping rules are long grounded and well founded.
For years, free-market analysts and government statisticians have warned of the deadly effect of increasing corporate auto fuel economy standards (CAFE). Sam Kazman at the Competitive Enterprise Institute explained a decade ago: “(T)he evidence on this issue comes from no less a body than the National Academy of Sciences, which issued a report last August finding that CAFE contributes to between 1,300 and 2,600 traffic deaths per year. Given that this program has been in effect for more than two decades, its cumulative toll is staggering.”
H. Sterling Burnett of the National Center for Policy Analysis adds that NHTSA data indicate that “322 additional deaths per year occur as a direct result of reducing just 100 pounds from already downsized small cars, with half of the deaths attributed to small car collisions with light trucks/sport utility vehicles.” USA Today further calculated that the “size and weight reductions of passenger vehicles undertaken to meet current CAFE standards had resulted in more than 46,000 deaths.”
These lethal regulations should be wrapped in yellow police “CAUTION” tape. The tradeoffs are stark and simple: CAFE fuel standards clamp down on the production of larger, more crashworthy cars. Analysts from Harvard to the Brookings Institution to the federal government itself have arrived at the same conclusion: CAFE kills. Welcome to the bloody intersection between the Obama jobs death toll and the Obama green death toll.
COPYRIGHT 2013 MICHELLE MALKIN/CREATORS.COM
Michelle Malkin is a conservative blogger, columnist, regular Fox News contributor, and author of many New York Times bestselling books.
Be the first to read Michelle Malkin's columns and other Voice of Sanity articles by signing up today and having them delivered directly into your inbox each morning.
Additional articles by Michelle MalkinComment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints. Make your case passionately, but please keep your comments civil and to the point (maximum of 1500 characters). Obscene, profane, abusive, or off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.
If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion. Thanks for your participation.





Good Morning Ms Malkin,
Thanks for your most informative and thought-stimulating articles.
Have a blessed day,
Ken McDonald
I think the the White house increases the automobiles prices and also their tax. That should be the problems for the drivers.
Accountants Birmingham
The idiots don't realize that the technology is not available to get 54 MPG from an internal combustion engine. Electric cars are worthless out here in west Texas. If you are lucky a charge will get you where you are going. Then What! If you find someplace to charge it you can go home eight hours later.
Bill,
Mopeds get up to 100
Just throw your hay on the back of a moped, and strap that cow trailer on the moped… sing a song to bambam and the unicorns will take you where you want to go…
As the king drives around in a 10,000 lb plus, Caddy limo with entourage at 8 mpg or less, we the people drive a "Smart" car with the optional Pall Bearer handles. I don't think so. I'm keeping my '57 Desoto.
Nice. I'm a Ford girl myself, and partial to muscle cars but my baby is a two-tone '72 F250 with a 360.
If auto companies truly support high fuel efficiency standards I suspect older cars are to be concurrently outlawed, forcing everyone to 'buy' one of the newer models.
The reason I say 'buy' is because (providing the economy isn't completely in the toilet by then) there will probably also be another "cash for clunkers" program.
After all the last one was such a success; for one thing there is now a serious lack of decent, cheap used cars for sale. Used to be a lot of them. Not any more. You have to buy new, or new-er… new enough to cost enough to require financing anyway.
And, prices are actually going up! I sold my '05 Toyota for market value in '10, which was $7,500 at the time. That same year and model is now selling for up to $13,000. Incredible.
(HONEST MONEY)= less technocrats
less technocrats=smaller government
smaller government=less bureaucracy
less bureaucracy=more competition
more competition=improved production
improved production=positive practical prosperity
positive practical prosperity=wisdom
wisdom=less machines
less machines=humane society
humane society=LIFE,LIBERTY,PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS and a limited government to protect our individual sovereign rights.
more competition=improved production…wisdom=less machines…less machines=humane society
flow chart, or wolf chart? semordnilap is palindrome, spelled backwards, lol.
i watched "the grey" a couple nights ago, speaking of wolves. spoiler alert: machine-ly minimal man, all fate-meeting poetry aside, does not fare well. there are no luddites in wolf dens, lol….
Would like Michalle Makin e mail adres. she writes an excedlent column. Bob
I Agree with you.
President Obama himself said that his anti coal regulations would "necessarily cause the price of electricity to skyrocket." Exactly how are people going to save money buying electric cars?
… b/c all the "politically correct" citizens will be subsidized by the rest of us rubes…
the "people" will save… while the "rubes" waste money paying taxes to subsidize the "savers"
This is one of the more memorable posts I have read on this topic – in large part due to the writing style displayed here. Inasmuch as I appreciate reading informative posts, I appreciate
Houston Limo Bus