Thomas Sowell

Random Thoughts

By Thomas Sowell - Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Random thoughts on the passing scene:

Not since the days of slavery have there been so many people who feel entitled to what other people have produced as there are in the modern welfare state, whether in Western Europe or on this side of the Atlantic.

Economist Edward Lazear has cut through all of Barack Obama’s claims about “creating jobs” with one plain and inescapable fact — “there hasn’t been one day during the entire Obama presidency when as many Americans were working as on the day President Bush left office.” Whatever number of jobs were created during the Obama administration, more have been lost.

How are children supposed to learn to act like adults, when so much of what they see on television shows adults acting like children?

The know-it-all smirks and condescending laughs of Vice President Joe Biden, when Congressman Paul Ryan was speaking during their debate, were a little much from an administration presiding over economic woes at home and disasters overseas — and being caught in lies about both. Like Barack Obama, Joe Biden has all the clever tricks of a politician and none of the wisdom of a statesman.

If you truly believe in the brotherhood of man, then you must believe that blacks are just as capable of being racists as whites are.

One of the most foolish, and most dangerous, things one can do is to take love for granted, instead of nurturing it and safeguarding it as the prize jewel of one’s life.

Whenever you hear people talking about “a living Constitution,” almost invariably they are people who are in the process of slowly killing it by “interpreting” its restrictions on government out of existence.

Do either Barack Obama or his followers have any idea how many countries during the 20th century set out to “spread the wealth” — and ended up spreading poverty instead? At some point, you have to turn from rhetoric, theories and ideologies to facts.

I am so old that I can remember when liberals were liberal — instead of being intolerant of anything and anybody that is not politically correct.

Whatever happened to Julie Banderas of the Fox News Channel? She had brains, looks, wit and personality. Has she met with foul play? Or has some zillionaire married her and taken her off to his own private island?

The question to be asked of people in the media, and that they should ask themselves, should be: “Is your first loyalty to your audience or to your ideology?” The same question should be asked of educators, especially those who see themselves as “agents of social change,” even though that is not the job description under which they have been hired and paid.

People who complain about “negative” campaign ads miss the point. It is perfectly legitimate to criticize your opponent. The question is whether the ads are about serious things that matter to the future of this country, and whether they are telling the truth or lying.

If you believe Barack Obama and others who oppose what they call “tax cuts for the rich,” you might want to consider what the late Daniel Patrick Moynihan once said: “You are entitled to your own opinion, but not to your own facts.” If you want to see some documented facts about tax rates and tax revenues, there is a box titled “Tax Cuts” on my web site (www.tsowell.com). Click on it.

In baseball, switch hitters are said to have an advantage. But the highest lifetime batting average by a switch hitter (.319 by Frankie Frisch) is more than 30 points lower than the highest batting average for either left-handed hitters or right-handed hitters. The highest batting average in a season by a switch hitter (.365 by Mickey Mantle) is more than 50 points lower.

If there is ever a Hall of Fame for confidence men, Charles Ponzi and Bernie Madoff will have to take a back seat to Barack Obama. Obama is the gold standard — or, perhaps more appropriately, the brass standard.

I have never known a word to become absolute dogma, without a speck of evidence, the way “diversity” has.

COPYRIGHT 2013 THOMAS SOWELL/CREATORS.COM


Be the first to read Thomas Sowell's columns and other Voice of Sanity articles by signing up today and having them delivered directly into your inbox each morning.

Additional articles by Thomas Sowell

Respond to Writer

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints. Make your case passionately, but please keep your comments civil and to the point (maximum of 1500 characters). Obscene, profane, abusive, or off-topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked.

If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion. Thanks for your participation.

5 Responses to “Random Thoughts”

  1. john bear says:

    Dawson's Law from the Book of Common Misery: Ancient Roman pols created what they called 'bread and circuses' to keep themselves in power by buying votes from the poor. The taxes became so high to keep the poor in food and fun that those being robbed sold themselves into slavery. It became a problem for the pols because tax revenues were going down. So they passed a law forcing free men to remain free by disallowing them from selling themselves into slavery. We now call it the Welfare State — or what I call the Empire of the Designer Poor. Same game, just different faces; only you can't sell yourself into slavery to escape the high taxation.

  2. reunion says:

    < Whenever you hear people talking about “a living Constitution,” almost invariably they are people who are in the process of slowly killing it by “interpreting” its restrictions on government out of existence.

    "Perhaps the most significant example of the effort to produce a legal system grounded in "reason" instead of in "violence" can be found in the creation of constitutional governments. The basic premise of constitutional systems is found in the fiction of a "social contract", whereby millions of free individuals would create a government which would, by virtue of strictly enumerated powers within the constitution, be limited in the scope of its authority. That such systems have NEVER been created by unanimous agreement, but have ALWAYS been imposed by a minority upon the rest of the population, should have been a tipoff as to the fallacies upon which they have been grounded.

    But if the coercive origins of constitutional governments are not enough to convince one that violence cannot be restrained by such devices, perhaps the history of the 20th century will provide insight. Suspicions might first be aroused by the awareness that the Soviet Union operated on the basis of a "constitution" – modeled upon the American system, complete with a "bill of rights". But further evidence can be found within the history of the United States Constitution itself.

    If one reads a history of the cases decided by the United States Supreme Court, one finds the following fairly consistent patterns: (1) POWERS granted to the federal government have been given EXPANSIVE definitions – as witness the court's "reasoning" that the "commerce clause" powers are not "limited to" economic transactions that cross state lines, but may be used to force social change, control undesirable personal conduct, & virtually any other end Congress might have in mind. Likewise the "necessary & proper" clause has not been confined to such measures as are absolutely ESSENTIAL to some stated end, but has been expanded to embrace any means that are CONVENIENT to such purposes.

  3. Gill O’Teen says:

    According to her bio on the Foxnews website Julie Banderas currently serves as a co-host of "FOX & Friends First", which is presented weekdays at 5 AM/ET.

    • Gill O’Teen says:

      Most curiously, a search of the "FOX & Friends First" info reveals nobody named Julie Banderas; whereas a search of all Fox News gives the above info. Has Dr. Sowell discovered a sinister Rupert Murdoch or bull o'really secret?

  4. TrialRunGovernment says:

    The theory of physical evolution is as impossibly improbable as is any theory of social evolution to complete it. [Though there are many would be rulers willing to give it a try!]
    At the beginning of the Bible there are two significant trees.
    They are the Tree of Life and the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.
    These two trees represent two forms of Government over all the other trees mentioned as growing in the Garden.
    The Tree of Life, represents Divine Government under the benign Kingship of Jesus Christ.
    The other, The Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, represents all governments of men.
    To live by God's Life, accessed through His Spirit and Word, is far higher and far safer, than living by so called democracy, even a democracy based on the highest conceptions of "Good vs Evil" laws enshrined in an impeccably constructed and enforced Constitution.
    Take a good look at human history and the Bible, and use your God given intelligence and will, to choose which of the two trees you prefer to govern you for the longest phase of your existence. [No bleating about preferential silver spoons here!]

Leave a Reply

To Receive Free Daily
Articles Via E-mail
Click Here

Featured Columnists

The Problem:
A Government-Created Depression
The Solution: Set the Entrepreneur Free to Create Wealth!

Click here to learn about Robert Ringer's landmark new book, The Entrepreneur:
The Way Back for the U.S. Economy
, that is shocking the establishment.

Liberty Education
Interview Series

Robert Ringer interviews top political, economic, and social leaders on today's most vital and controversial issues.

Wayne Allyn Root Interview

Featured Interview:
Wayne Allyn Root

Audio file loading...

More Interviews